Remote Viewing Statistics

Analysis of comparative judging scores across all sessions

Statistical Significance Test

Spearman Correlation
-0.697
Negative trend
P-Value
0.0125
One-tailed test
Statistical Significance
Significant
p < 0.05

All Session Types

Total Sessions: 4,123 | Random Baseline per rank: 412.3

Loading chart...

Statistical Significance Over Time

Current P-Value: 0.0125 | Status: Statistically Significant

Loading chart...

About Comparative Judging

We use a decoy-based scoring approach to evaluate sessions. A judge is shown a user's session alongside 10 targets in random order—one real target and nine decoys. The judge doesn't know which target is real.

The judge's task is to rank these 10 targets based on how well each corresponds to the user's impressions. A score of 1 means the judge picked the real target as the best match; a score of 10 means the real target was ranked last.

If remote viewing is not real, we expect a uniform distribution (shown as the Random Baseline) where each rank is equally likely. If remote viewing is real, we expect to see more sessions scored 1, 2, and 3 than 8, 9, and 10.