Remote Viewing Statistics
Analysis of comparative judging scores across all sessions
Statistical Significance Test
All Session Types
Total Sessions: 4,123 | Random Baseline per rank: 412.3
Loading chart...
Statistical Significance Over Time
Current P-Value: 0.0125 | Status: Statistically Significant
Loading chart...
About Comparative Judging
We use a decoy-based scoring approach to evaluate sessions. A judge is shown a user's session alongside 10 targets in random order—one real target and nine decoys. The judge doesn't know which target is real.
The judge's task is to rank these 10 targets based on how well each corresponds to the user's impressions. A score of 1 means the judge picked the real target as the best match; a score of 10 means the real target was ranked last.
If remote viewing is not real, we expect a uniform distribution (shown as the Random Baseline) where each rank is equally likely. If remote viewing is real, we expect to see more sessions scored 1, 2, and 3 than 8, 9, and 10.