5: Good correspondence with unambiguous
unique matchable elements, but some
incorrect information.
The first word of my session is Stone and the last two words were stone work. Read all the notes, they describe the feeling of the target picture pretty well. "Angles that form identifiable contextual shapes" was a usable description of the stars. I do mention golden light and consider how the design in gold is a film camera (Some design element that strikes you as if you're being looked at). The circle shapes might have contributed to the eye-like impressions. Also consider that the name on the closest star (looking down at an ornate structure...seen from the point of the angle) is Sharon STONE.
Super fun session. I rated it a 5 because the sketches weren't great but they carried the feelings well enough so they did their job.
Community Score
—
Average Score (0 votes)
Sign in to rate this session
Comparative Judging (Beta)
AI blindly ranks your session against 9 targets from your session history. For more information, see the Comparative Judging section of the Learn page.
Target Ranking
#8
out of 10
AI Judge Reasoning
The Walk of Fame features a stone-like appearance and geometric shapes, matching some elements of the session data. However, it lacks the specific motif of having eyes or anthropomorphic features, making it a less direct match than the robot.
Does this analysis feel accurate? Help us make scoring better